Recruitment · Updated October 2026
Garden leave is a notice period in which the employee stays on the payroll and is paid in full but is told not to work, not to come in and often not to contact clients or colleagues. Employers use it for senior or sensitive roles to keep a departing person away from confidential information during the notice period, especially when they are joining a competitor.
No Indian statute defines garden leave. It exists only if the employment contract or offer terms provide for it, usually as a clause that lets the employer require the employee to stay away from work for some or all of the notice. While on it, the person remains an employee: salary, benefits, PF and leave accrual continue, and the usual duties of loyalty and confidentiality still bind them. Most employers also bar them from taking another job until the notice ends.
Because the employee is still employed, the arrangement is the opposite of a post-exit restriction. The employer is not stopping anyone from working after leaving; it is deciding how the notice time is spent. That is the main reason garden leave is easier to defend than a non-compete.
Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 treats agreements that restrain a person from a lawful profession, trade or business as void to that extent. Courts have generally been willing to enforce restrictions that operate only while the employee is bound to serve the employer, a principle going back to the Supreme Court’s Niranjan Shankar Golikari decision. By contrast, post-employment non-compete clauses are widely regarded as unenforceable in India. Garden leave sits on the safer side of that line as long as it stays within the notice period. Very long garden leave, or one that continues after employment has ended, risks being treated as a restraint. This is a reading from law-firm commentary rather than settled black-letter law, so get a lawyer to look at any specific clause.
If the contract allows it, the employee has little room to refuse, since the pay continues. If the contract is silent, the employer would be relying on its right to direct work, and a dispute is possible.
It should be. Reduced pay while barring someone from working raises the restraint issue sharply. Include it in the full and final settlement calculations as ordinary service.
The person is still an employee until the notice ends, so the period is generally continuous service, but check how your contract and policies treat it.
See the full sequence of exit steps on the employee offboarding page.